ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½

Unsupported Browser
The ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ website is not compatible with Internet Explorer 11, IE 11. For the best experience please update your browser.
Menu
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½colleagues. It's all here.

Become a Member
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½colleagues. It's all here.

Become a Member
ACS
ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½

Resources

Site Visit Preparation

ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½Quality Tools

Publications

Journal of the ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½

The study gathered and analyzed evidence associated with the three principles: standardized team-based care across the five phases of surgical care, disease-based management, and external regulatory review. 

Cardell, Chelsea F MD, MSa,b*; Peters, Xane D MD, MSb; Hu, Q Lina MD, MSa,c; Robinson-Gerace, Amya; Mistretta, Stephanie MA, LCSWa; Wescott, Annie B MLISd; Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda MD, MSHS, FACSc; Hoyt, David B MD, FACSa; Ko, Clifford Y MD, MSHS, MS, FACSa,e. Evidence Review for the ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ Quality Verification Part III: Standardization, Protocols, and Achieving Better Outcomes for Patient Care. Journal of the ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ ():10.1097/XCS.0000000000001126, July 09, 2024. | DOI: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001126

The study group gathered and analyzed evidence associated with five principles that address processes for identification and resolution of quality improvement issues: case review, peer review, credentialing and privileging, data for surveillance, and continuous quality improvement using data.

Fischer CP, Hu QL, Wescott AB, Maggard-Gibbons M, Hoyt DB, Ko CY. Evidence Review for the ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ Quality Verification Part II: Processes for Reliable Quality Improvement [published online ahead of print, 2021 Apr 30]. J Am Coll Surg. 2021;S1072-7515(21)00244-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.03.028

The study gathered and analyzed evidence associated with the first four principles that address institutional and administrative factors necessary for high quality surgical care: a top-down commitment to quality, mid-level leadership, and committee structure, including the scope and governance of a quality program and infrastructure.

Hu QL, Fischer CP, Wescott AB, Maggard-Gibbons M, Hoyt DB, Ko CY. Evidence Review for the ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ Quality Verification Part I: Building Quality and Safety Resources and Infrastructure. J Am Coll Surg. 2020;231(5):557-569.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.08.758

Bulletin of the ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½

October 2021

June 2021

January 2021

October 2020

July 2020

April 2020

April 2019

July 2018

April 2018

March 2018

February 2018

January 2018

December 2017

November 2017

Media Coverage

Podcasts and Interviews


TopMedTalk Podcast spoke with Dr. Clifford Y. Ko about the ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½Quality programs and the new ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½Quality Verification Program for hospitals.

News and Press Releases

New Quality Verification Program for hospitals will benefit participants in the ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program